Norisbel Uceta warns about the displacement of politicians by technocrats

Political and technical tension: The change in the Superintendency of Banks under the microscope

The recent appointment of Víctor Cedeño Brea as Superintendent of Banks, filling the position left vacant by Alejandro Fernández W., has sparked a deep debate regarding the direction of the government administration. Beyond a simple administrative adjustment, this move is seen as a sign of the growing distance between the technocracy and the organic base of the ruling party.

From the analysis conducted on the Politikal program, a worrying trend has been warned about: the displacement of political cadres in favor of technical profiles that, according to critics, lack a connection to the party reality that sustains the government.

The disconnection between technicians and managers

The central point of the debate lies in the importance of recognizing fieldwork. Analyst Norisbel Uceta was emphatic in pointing out that electoral success does not depend solely on economic indicators or academic profiles, but on the constant effort of the leaders who mobilize the membership.

The ones who do the work so that you can win are precisely the leaders.

While Fernández W. maintained an active public presence and a career linked to politics since 2020, the arrival of Cedeño Brea, a purely academic profile with a doctorate and training at PUCMM, has reopened the discussion on whether technical efficiency is sufficient to guarantee the political sustainability of an administration.

Who will guarantee the votes in the future?

The analysis suggests that there is a form of strategic ingratitude when desk management ignores those who have worked on the ground. The warning is clear: a government that locks itself in luxury offices runs the risk of losing the support of its base, a fundamental element for any upcoming electoral contest.

Who are you going to win those next elections with? With the technicians you have there? No, with the leaders.

Finally, it is emphasized that in Dominican politics, incentives are an undeniable reality. For leaders who have worked hard in the field, institutional courtesy is insufficient if it is not accompanied by real empowerment and a share of power that recognizes their work within the state structure.