WNBA: CBA negotiations on the brink, strike on the horizon?

WNBA Negotiations: Is a Deal or a Strike on the Horizon?

The league meetings in New York last week, where the owners, presidents, general managers, and coaches of the WNBA teams met, were marked by a key question: When will the league and the Women’s National Basketball Players Association (WNBPA) reach a new collective bargaining agreement? Could there be a strike on the horizon? New details were leaked on Tuesday night: the league’s latest proposal, which includes revenue sharing, a maximum salary of over $1.1 million starting in 2026, a minimum of over $220,000, and an average of over $460,000. It remains unclear how the players will react to this proposal and whether it will boost negotiations before the new deadline of November 30. A negotiation session was expected on Wednesday. The union did not respond to requests for comment on Tuesday evening. Job uncertainty could have serious consequences. The longer it takes without an agreement, the greater the repercussions will be. And without an agreement in sight, the damages begin to accumulate.

“The basketball schedule is already at a point where it will be affected. They are already there,” a source said.

Source

Negotiations on the collective agreement and what could happen from now on is the central theme.

Priorities at the negotiating table

The salary structure and income distribution have been the focus of collective bargaining. Significant salary increases are expected for the players, but both sides have not agreed on how those systems should be. These were some of the issues that the players emphasized when they chose not to renew the current collective bargaining agreement in October 2024. The most important issues also include establishing minimum professional standards at the facilities and codifying the league’s travel program. The league has expressed its desire to substantially increase player salaries and other cost commitments, while incentivizing owners to continue investing in the business. The enormous growth of the WNBA in recent years provides the opportunity for the business to move from operating at a loss to generating sustained profitability. The expansion of retirement and family planning benefits has also been a priority for the players. After more than 40 players met with the league before the All-Star weekend at the end of July, Breanna Stewart, vice president of the WNBPA, said that those issues were the only two points on which both sides had agreed at that time. Prioritization, a set of rules that requires WNBA players who compete in other leagues to report on time for WNBA training camp or be suspended for the season, became a contentious issue after it was introduced in the last collective bargaining agreement. But it’s unlikely that owners will want to relax those rules, especially amid the expected salary increases in the WNBA. A source revealed that the issue has not been a major point in negotiations so far and is not considered a major point of controversy. The players have also expressed their desire to weaken or completely abolish the “central” system, similar to the NFL’s franchise tag, which was already greatly reduced in the last collective bargaining agreement. But the league is unlikely to want to give that up entirely, as it gives teams the opportunity to develop and retain drafted talent, which can create a competitive leveling effect. The league’s roster limits and 12 players (many franchises only have 11 players) have often frustrated team staff. WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert has previously said that the league prefers expansion as a way to increase its size rather than adding roster spots, while the league prefers not to soften the salary cap, as it believes that some teams spending significantly more than others would create an uneven playing field. Another issue to be resolved is the number of games and scheduling in the future; there was a maximum of 44 games allowed in the current collective bargaining agreement, and although the league cannot always maintain the exact same footprint due to international competitions, Engelbert has said that the league would like to try to stick to May to October, with some overlap in November as needed in a year like 2026, when the WNBA will take a break for the FIBA World Cup.

Do leagues like Unrivaled or Project B impact negotiations?

WNBA players have competed in other leagues, historically internationally, since the league’s creation. But the domestic landscape changed dramatically last year when Unrivaled, a 3-on-3 league founded by Stewart and Napheesa Collier, launched its inaugural season, which ran from January to March. Unrivaled has been characterized as an alternative for players who want to supplement their income without going abroad during the WNBA’s off-season, and league staff have said that Unrivaled does not intend to be a competitor to the WNBA. Even so, some players have indicated that they hope Unrivaled, with its high salaries and excellent player amenities, can put pressure on the WNBA during this round of collective bargaining negotiations. Unrivaled offered shares to the players last year and, in the future, aims to provide an average salary of $200,000, which the league claims is the highest average salary in women’s professional team sports. In recent weeks, a new league called Project B has announced its intention to debut in November 2026 and operate until April 2027, with WNBPA president Nneka Ogwumike, Alyssa Thomas, Jonquel Jones, and Jewell Loyd among its first public signings. The league’s model features 66 players competing in an international circuit in Europe and Asia, similar to a Formula 1 format. In addition to having shares for the players, it is reported that their salaries will reach seven figures, above what both the WNBA and Unrivaled offer (the schedule of the latter directly conflicts with that of Project B). Like Unrivaled, Project B says it is not a competing league to the WNBA. While prioritization rules ensure WNBA players arrive at training camp on time, the league has no plans to seek exclusivity—meaning its players would only play in the WNBA and nowhere else in the offseason—during this round of negotiations, a source said.

Will eligibility for the WNBA draft change in this collective bargaining agreement?

The start of the college season has evoked a familiar question for basketball fans: Should the WNBA change its draft eligibility rules? Unlike the one-and-done rule in the NBA, players must be 22 years old in the calendar year of the WNBA draft to be eligible (unless they have graduated early). International players must be 20 years old during the draft calendar year to be eligible. A source revealed that draft eligibility has not been a significant topic of discussion in the negotiations so far.

Are there any news about the expansion draft?

As we’ve already mentioned, the celebration of the WNBA expansion draft for the Toronto Tempo and Portland Fire is one of the first things that will be done once a new collective bargaining agreement is established. The parameters for the expansion draft must be established in the new collective bargaining agreement, so no rules or guidelines have been given to the teams. But the expectation is that a coin flip will determine which of the two newcomers will choose first in the college and expansion drafts (i.e., the team that goes first in the expansion draft will pick seventh in the college draft, and whoever goes second in the expansion draft will pick sixth in the college draft; the number 6 pick is the first pick after the lottery picks). The expansion draft for the Golden State Valkyries took place on December 6th, and the 12 teams in the league were able to protect six players. Golden State selected 11 players, taking one from each team, except Seattle. Since this expansion draft will have two teams building rosters, it is believed that perhaps the other teams in the league can only protect five players this time.October 30th Update

What is the biggest problem keeping the parties apart?

In public comments, the players have hinted that the two sides are speaking different languages at the negotiating table, and the main point of disagreement is how a salary system and revenue sharing should be. NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said on the “Today” show in October that WNBA players can expect a “significant increase” in their salaries. But players are seeking a salary system that grows with the business (as in the NBA, which uses basketball-related income to determine its salary cap) rather than a fixed-rate model in the current collective bargaining agreement, where the salary cap increases annually by 3%. The league’s salary cap was $1,507,100 in 2025, with a minimum salary of $66,079 and a supermax of $249,244. The current collective bargaining agreement also has a revenue-sharing provision that would result in direct payments to the players if the league reaches certain revenue targets, but it has not yet been activated. Silver said on the “Today” show that participation “is not the right way to look at it because there is much more revenue in the NBA,” suggesting that expenses could still consume a very significant portion of the revenue pie compared to other sports leagues. The WNBPA said in October that the league has “put lipstick on a pig and has once again trod on a system that is not tied to any part of the business and intentionally devalues the players.” The league, for its part, has insisted that it has offered a “revenue sharing model without a cap that is directly linked to the performance of the league.” And it has continued to maintain that it wants, as WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert said during the WNBA Finals, “to balance the significant increase in salaries and benefits with the long-term viability of the league” and that so far “the Players Association has not yet offered a viable economic proposal.”

What happens if there is no agreement at the end of the 30 days?

Another extension is always possible, although the WNBA has a lot to fit into this offseason. And even if the agreement expires, a strike would not automatically follow. Technically, it is not necessary for there to be an extension for both parties to continue negotiating; instead, they would enter a phase called “statu quo” in which the working conditions of the current collective agreement would remain in force. The problem: if there is no extension, it would open the door to a possible strike, either a strike initiated by the players or a lockout initiated by the owners. So far, that is not an overwhelming concern. Even before the extension was agreed on October 30, sources throughout the league said they did not believe a strike was imminent.

What’s up with this condensed offseason calendar? What needs to happen before next season can begin?

A lot, starting with an expansion draft for the Portland Fire and the Toronto Tempo. Once that concludes, free agency offers unprecedented uncertainty with almost half of the league’s players unrestricted. The situation is very different from the collective bargaining negotiations that dragged on well into the spring of 2003. That collective bargaining agreement introduced free agency for the first time, and only for a limited number of players, which means the league could go from a preliminary agreement with the players on an agreement on April 18 to training camp starting two weeks later, on May 1, with the WNBA draft and a dispersal draft in between. We saw the NBA go from a preliminary agreement to end its 2011 lockout on November 26 to training camps starting on December 9, less than two weeks later, but the league was able to hold free agency at the same time. That’s not realistic given the scope of WNBA free agency, and the new collective bargaining agreement could revise the salary cap in the WNBA more drastically than we’ve seen from one NBA agreement to another. As a result, around three weeks is the fastest the WNBA could reasonably expect to go from an agreement on a deal to holding practices. Ideally, of course, the league wants to move towards an agreement in early January to avoid delaying the typical offseason schedule too substantially. That’s especially important for Fire and Tempo, which could promote their inaugural season by having real players on their roster.October 22nd Update

How does negotiation work logistically?

When the league and the WNBPA hold negotiation sessions, there can be a variety of stakeholders in the room, and they are not always the same people at each meeting, sources familiar with the negotiations said. WNBA and NBA staff, as well as their external advisors, represent the league’s side, and WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert attends all substantive negotiation meetings, according to previous negotiations in 2019 and with the actions of former league presidents. WNBPA staff and external advisors are the main participants on the union side, although WNBPA advisors and player leadership may also attend.

The collective bargaining agreement committee for the players is usually made up of at least 33 players: the 26 player representatives (two per team), seven executive committee members (Nneka Ogwumike, Kelsey Plum, Elizabeth Williams, Brianna Turner, Alysha Clark, Napheesa Collier, and Breanna Stewart) and some other players outside of those groups who have chosen to participate. The league has its own version of that group, the labor relations committee, with seven owners and team executives: Suzanne Abair of the Atlanta Dream, Greg Bibb of the Dallas Wings, Ginny Gilder of the Seattle Storm, Kelly Krauskopf of the Indiana Fever, Mat Ishbia of the Phoenix Mercury, Nadia Rawlinson of the Chicago Sky, and Jennifer Rizzotti of the Connecticut Sun. That committee does not participate in the negotiation sessions. The league and the WNBPA first met in December 2024 for a preliminary conversation about the new collective bargaining agreement and held a larger in-person meeting with representatives from the labor relations committee and more than 40 players at the All-Star weekend at the end of July. Since then, the WNBPA has met with player leadership “weekly, if not a couple of times a week,” according to a source, and the two sides have continued to talk regularly, although the participants and scope have fluctuated.