Corpo case in Cotuí: Prosecutor responds to Ramón Tolentino regarding conviction

alofoke
2 Min Read

Details regarding the court case of José Antonio García Ramírez in Cotuí

Journalist Ramón Tolentino traveled to the Sánchez Ramírez Prosecutor’s Office to address the controversial legal process against José Antonio García Ramírez, popularly known as “Corpo.” The defendant, who initially received a 20-year prison sentence, saw his sentence reduced to 15 years following a new trial, a situation that has raised questions regarding the handling of the case.

During the meeting, Tolentino requested explanations from Magistrate Rolando Vázquez regarding the grounds that motivated the annulment of the original sentence and the subsequent variation in the ruling. In this regard, the representative of the Public Prosecutor’s Office emphasized that procedural debates must be strictly confined to the courts and not to the realm of social media.

It was proven in court. It is not what Magistrate Rolando says, it is what the evidence says.

Magistrate Rolando Vázquez

The weight of evidence in the process

Magistrate Vázquez underscored the sensitivity of the case, as it involves an accusation of sexual abuse against a minor, who is the niece of the defendant himself. As he explained, in the first instance, a collegiate court composed of three judges ruled the defendant guilty, considering that the Public Prosecutor’s Office presented sufficient evidentiary elements that overcame any reasonable doubt.

The prosecutor detailed key aspects regarding the nature of the judicial investigation:

  • The Public Prosecutor’s Office has the responsibility to seek evidence both for and against the accused.
  • The defendant has the legal right to propose proceedings to gather evidence that supports their defense.
  • In this specific process, six testimonial pieces of evidence formally presented by the defense were admitted.

This interview is part of the research work being conducted by Ramón Tolentino in the province of Cotuí, with the aim of collecting and contrasting the different versions and arguments surrounding the García Ramírez case file, thus ensuring a clear overview of the procedures carried out in the Sánchez Ramírez jurisdiction.

Share This Article