NFL Contract Analysis: Which Ones Are Most and Least Favorable?
The intricate contract system in the NFL is key to understanding which agreements benefit teams the most and which ones benefit players. It’s not simply a matter of rating contracts as “best” or “worst,” as perspective is fundamental. A contract unfavorable to a team can be excellent for a player, and vice versa. In this analysis, we will explore outstanding agreements in different positions, from those most favorable to teams to those most advantageous to players, explaining the reasons behind each one. We begin, as is often the case, with the quarterbacks.
Quarterbacks: The Heart of the Strategy
Quarterbacks’ contracts are crucial. Here we analyze a team-friendly deal and another that benefits the player.Favorable Agreement for the Team: Sam Darnold, Seattle Seahawks
The agreement: Three years, $100.5 million, with $37.5 million fully guaranteed at signing and $55 million in total guarantees. Darnold, after a season with 35 touchdown passes with the Vikings, arrived as an unrestricted free agent, and the Seahawks secured this deal. The Seahawks’ policy of not guaranteeing money in veteran contracts beyond the first year makes the deal favorable for the team. If the Seahawks decide to terminate the contract after this season, they only have to pay him $37.5 million. If Darnold is still on the roster five days after this season’s Super Bowl, his 2026 roster bonus is fully guaranteed, as is a portion of his 2026 salary. If Seattle reaches the Super Bowl, they will need to make a decision immediately after the season. If Darnold plays the first two years of this contract, he will have earned $65 million. If he plays all three, he will receive the full $100.5 million. Even so, that’s only $33.5 million per year, making Darnold the eighteenth highest-paid quarterback in the league by average annual salary. A favorable deal for the team.Favorable Agreement for the Player: Dak Prescott, Dallas Cowboys
The agreement: Four years, $240 million, with $129 million fully guaranteed at signing and $231 million in total guarantees. Prescott waited until the last moment to sign this extension, which gave him an advantageous position. He received a considerable signing bonus and other cash amounts. The deal also included a guaranteed amount for 2025 and an injury guarantee for 2026 that became a full guarantee. If the Cowboys were to release Prescott now, he would have already received $174 million. His deal continues to benefit him, with guaranteed salaries in future years. The odds of Prescott receiving the $231 million in guarantees are very high. A consolation for the Cowboys is that, due to insurance and the fact that Prescott missed the last nine games of the 2024 season due to an injury, they were able to recover part of the signing bonus. However, Prescott did not have to return that money, but rather the insurance company. A favorable agreement for the player.
Runners: The Value in the Ground Game
The value of running backs in the NFL is also reflected in their contracts. Here we analyze a team-friendly contract and another for the player.Favorable Agreement for the Team: Josh Jacobs, Green Bay Packers
The agreement: Four years, $48 million, with $12.5 million fully guaranteed upon signing and $12.5 million in total guarantees. The Packers signed Jacobs as a relative bargain. The deal was good for the Packers because they weren’t committed to him beyond the first year. Jacobs received a signing bonus, a non-guaranteed salary, and game and roster bonuses that raised his total compensation in 2024. Three running backs make more than that per season, so it’s good money for one season. If the Packers had decided to release him this offseason, they would have only lost those $14.8 million.If the Packers cut Jacobs after this season, they would have paid him $23 million in two years, an average of $11.5 million per year, which ranks him sixth among running backs. Unless the Packers reward Jacobs with an extension after his solid first season, he will remain one of the best values in the league at his position. And if his game declines, Green Bay can cut him without owing him any money.
Favorable Agreement for the Player: Ashton Jeanty, Las Vegas Raiders
The agreement: Four years, $35,895,812 fully guaranteed upon signing, plus a team option for the fifth year in 2029. Once the Raiders selected Jeanty, this was his contract; rookie deals are assigned, and first-round picks get fully guaranteed deals. Jeanty’s average annual salary also places him among the top 11 running backs in the NFL. A rookie running back contract for a top 10 pick offers no value to the team.Open Receivers: Strategy and Value in the Aerial Attack
Open receiver contracts reflect the importance of the passing game. We analyze a team-friendly deal and another for the player.Favorable Agreement for the Team: DK Metcalf, Pittsburgh Steelers
The agreement: Four years, $132 million, with $60 million fully guaranteed upon signing and $60 million in total guarantees.Although it seems like a good deal for Metcalf, it’s not that unfavorable for the team. The Steelers will pay Metcalf $35 million this year and $25 million in 2026. After that, it’s entirely up to them. His 2027 salary is not guaranteed. If they wanted to cut him after 2026, they would have to do so before the third day of the league year in March 2027 to avoid paying him another $6.5 million. It’s a good deal for Pittsburgh, given the importance of wide receivers and Metcalf’s age.