Tension at McLaren: Analysis of the Incident in Singapore
The Singapore Grand Prix of Formula 1 left more to be desired than George Russell’s victory or McLaren’s defense of the constructors’ title. The focus of attention was on the contact between teammates Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri on the first lap. Analyzed under FIA rules, the incident was considered a simple “racing incident”, something common on the first lap of a Grand Prix. The stewards did not investigate, determining that the collision, without significant damage to the cars, did not warrant a post-race declaration. However, within McLaren’s internal battle, the incident was more delicate. Team rules promise fair play from the wall, in exchange for avoiding contact between the drivers on the track. This incident adds to a growing list of controversies that McLaren must manage as the season reaches its climax.What happened?
From fifth on the grid, Norris had a good start and attacked, overtaking Kimi Antonelli and going to the inside of his teammate at Turn 1. Piastri left space, but Norris closed in as he approached Turn 3, with Max Verstappen ahead.
Contents
Piastri continued with a tense exchange with his race engineer, Tom Stallard.“That wasn’t very team-oriented, but oh well,” Piastri said over the radio.
Oscar Piastri
- Lap 3: Piastri asks if it’s okay for Norris to “push him off the track.”
- Lap 4: Stallard asks Piastri to concentrate and that the stewards won’t take action. Piastri replies that it’s not fair.
Why didn’t McLaren intervene?
McLaren, under the direction of Andrea Stella, considered the contact between its drivers to be the result of the incident with Verstappen, a racing incident. Stella understood Piastri’s frustration, but reiterated that the drivers should express their opinions via radio. Stella emphasized the importance of communication and the perspective of the drivers, especially on the first lap.