Ferrari Questions Hamilton and Leclerc: Are They to Blame for the Failure?

Ferrari on the Tightrope: Criticism and Challenges in Formula 1

The recent statement by Ferrari president John Elkann has caused an earthquake in the Formula 1 world. His direct criticism of Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc after the São Paulo Grand Prix has highlighted the internal tension and the search for solutions in a team that hasn’t won a title for years. Elkann, in his statements, highlighted the performance of the mechanics and the improvement of the car, but also pointed out the need for the drivers to focus on driving and talk less. These words, interpreted by many as a veiled criticism of Hamilton and Leclerc, contrast with Ferrari’s recent triumph in the World Endurance Championship (WEC), an achievement that highlights the disparity of results between both categories.

“Brazil was a big disappointment. If we look at the Formula 1 championship, we can say that, on the one hand, we have our mechanics, who are actually winning the championship with their performance and everything they have done in the pit stops. If we look at our engineers, there is no doubt that the car has improved. If we look at the rest, it is not up to par. We certainly have drivers for whom it is important that they concentrate on driving and speak less, because we still have important races ahead and it is not impossible to get second place [in the constructors’ championship]”.

John Elkann, President of Ferrari

The drivers’ reaction was immediate. Both Leclerc and Hamilton used social media to express the need for unity and support for the team, respectively. However, Elkann’s words raise questions about Ferrari’s internal dynamics and the team’s ability to achieve success. Ferrari’s current situation, with performance below expectations, has generated an atmosphere of frustration. The team has struggled to find the technical balance and has seen how its rivals, such as Red Bull and Mercedes, have made significant progress. The lack of consistency in the car’s performance has affected the drivers, who have been limited in their ability to compete for the top positions.

The 2025 season has been a challenge for Ferrari. While Leclerc has achieved some podium finishes and Hamilton secured a victory in the sprint race in China, the team has not shown the consistency needed to compete for the championship. The lack of progress and the criticism from the drivers have highlighted the need for changes and improvements within the team. Leclerc’s situation is particularly delicate, as his future at Ferrari could depend on the team’s competitiveness. The driver has expressed his frustration with the lack of progress and has hinted at the possibility of seeking other options if Ferrari fails to be competitive. Leclerc’s departure, one of the most promising talents on the grid, would be a hard blow for the team. Elkann also referred to Ferrari’s success in the WEC, but this comparison is not entirely accurate. The endurance championship has a “balance of performance” system that benefits new teams, like Ferrari, which facilitates their success. In Formula 1, the competition is much fiercer and the challenges are greater. Elkann should be concerned about Ferrari’s current situation: why, despite its prestige, talent, and resources, it has failed to build a winning team that consistently competes with Red Bull, Mercedes, and McLaren. The key is to build a winning operation that lasts over time.