Ferrari Questions Hamilton and Leclerc: Are the Drivers to Blame?

Ferrari on the Tightrope: Fair Criticism or Blame Shifting?

The recent statement by Ferrari President John Elkann has unleashed a whirlwind in the Formula 1 world. Following the disappointing performance of its drivers, Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc, in the Sao Paulo Grand Prix, Elkann did not hesitate to directly point the finger at his drivers, generating controversy and questions about the direction of the Italian team. Elkann, in his statements, highlighted the good performance of the mechanics and the improvement of the car, but criticized the attitude of the drivers, suggesting that they should focus more on driving and less on talking. These words, interpreted by many as a strategy to deflect blame, contrast with Ferrari’s recent success in the World Endurance Championship (WEC), where they achieved victory in the 24 Hours of Le Mans, an achievement that highlights the disparity between both categories.

“If we look at the Formula 1 championship, we can say that, on the one hand, we have our mechanics, who are actually winning the championship with their performance and everything they have done in the pit stops. If we look at our engineers, there is no doubt that the car has improved. If we look at the rest, it is not up to par. We certainly have drivers for whom it is important that they concentrate on driving and speak less, because we still have important races ahead and it is not impossible to get second place [in the constructors’ championship]”.

John Elkann, President of Ferrari

The drivers’ reaction was immediate. Both Leclerc and Hamilton used social media to express the need for “unity” and “support” within the team. These statements, although subtle, hinted at the existing tension and the need for a change of course to achieve success. Elkann’s criticisms have raised important questions: Is the Ferrari president justifying the current situation of the team? Does Elkann understand the differences between a successful Formula 1 program and a WEC program? Are the drivers’ complaints about the lack of competitiveness of the car valid? Ferrari’s current situation, having not won a drivers’ championship since 2007 nor a constructors’ championship since 2008, reflects poor management and a lack of clear direction. Elkann’s criticisms, rather than solutions, seem to be an attempt to divert attention from the real problems.

Leclerc’s discontent is evident, and speculation about his future at Ferrari is growing. The lack of competitiveness of the car, added to the criticisms of the management, could lead the Monegasque driver to seek new horizons. Hamilton, for his part, has not managed to fully adapt to the team, and his performance has been below expectations. Elkann’s words, which suggest that the drivers should focus on driving and stop complaining, are a clear example of the lack of self-criticism and Ferrari’s inability to take responsibility. The team needs a profound change, going beyond the criticism of its drivers, to become competitive again. Ultimately, Ferrari’s success will depend on its ability to build a winning team and provide its drivers with a competitive car. Elkann’s statements, rather than solutions, seem to be a step backward on the road to glory.