Ferrari: Criticism of Hamilton and Leclerc after Brazilian GP, internal pressure?

alofoke
3 Min Read

Ferrari: Internal Criticism and the Weight of the Title Drought

The recent statement by John Elkann, Ferrari’s chairman, addressed to his drivers Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc, following the São Paulo Grand Prix, has sparked intense debate. This criticism, which followed a disappointing weekend for the team, where both drivers suffered retirements, comes at a time when Ferrari is celebrating the success of its endurance team, which broke a 53-year drought by winning the World Endurance Championship.

“Brazil was a big disappointment,” said Elkann. “Our mechanics are winning the championship with their performance. Our engineers have undoubtedly improved the car. But the rest is not up to par. We have drivers for whom it is important that they concentrate on driving and talk less, because we still have important races ahead and it is not impossible to get second place [in the constructors’ championship].”

John Elkann, President of Ferrari

These words, interpreted by some as an attempt to motivate the team, have been met with skepticism outside of Ferrari. Elkann’s statement highlights the team’s lack of titles in recent years, a drivers’ championship since 2007 and a constructors’ championship since 2008.

Following Elkann’s statements, both drivers reacted on social media. Leclerc emphasized the need for “unity” at Ferrari, while Hamilton reaffirmed his support for the team and himself. Ferrari’s performance this season has been inconsistent, with ups and downs in each race. Although the team has shown improvements, it has yet to compete with Red Bull and Mercedes, who have dominated the season. The current situation has raised doubts about Leclerc’s future at Ferrari and his possible departure from the team if significant improvements are not achieved. The driver’s loyalty and potential are key factors for the future of the team.
Charles Leclerc y Lewis Hamilton
Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton sit fifth and sixth, respectively, in this year’s drivers’ championship.
Ferrari’s focus should be on providing its drivers with a competitive car, rather than asking them to minimize their criticism. Ferrari’s history is full of examples of internal tensions and driver changes due to lack of results. Elkann’s reference to success in the World Endurance Championship has also generated controversy. Although it is an impressive achievement, some suggest that the conditions in that series favor Ferrari, which does not compare to the competitiveness of Formula 1. Ferrari, despite its prestige and talent, seems unable to build a winning team that consistently competes with its rivals. The lack of a sustained winning project is a concern for Elkann and the future of the team.
Share This Article