{"id":81689,"date":"2025-11-19T02:26:15","date_gmt":"2025-11-19T06:26:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/sin-categoria\/nascar-loses-legal-battle-antitrust-counterclaim-dismissed-2\/"},"modified":"2025-11-19T02:26:15","modified_gmt":"2025-11-19T06:26:15","slug":"nascar-loses-legal-battle-antitrust-counterclaim-dismissed-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/nascar\/nascar-loses-legal-battle-antitrust-counterclaim-dismissed-2\/","title":{"rendered":"NASCAR Loses Legal Battle: Antitrust Counterclaim Dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Federal Judge Dismisses NASCAR Counterclaim in Legal Dispute<\/h2>\n\nA federal judge ruled in favor of 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, dismissing the counterclaim filed by NASCAR in a legal dispute over allegations of anti-competitive practices.\n\nJudge Kenneth Bell issued a summary judgment in favor of the teams, rejecting NASCAR&#8217;s claim that Curtis Polk, co-owner of 23XI, had illegally conspired with other teams during negotiations for new bylaws.\n\n23XI, also owned by Michael Jordan and Denny Hamlin, had been the subject of a lawsuit by NASCAR, which argued that a 2023 boycott of a meeting of the team owners council negatively impacted media rights negotiations.\n\nJudge Bell determined that the boycott was a negotiation tactic &#8220;that seemed to have little impact&#8221;, as NASCAR initiated individual negotiations shortly thereafter.\n\nBell also concluded that 23XI and FRM did not participate in an &#8220;unreasonable restraint of trade,&#8221; as NASCAR&#8217;s individual meetings with the teams resulted in changes to the charter agreement.\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n\n<p>&#8220;The evidence here establishes that not only were individual negotiations &#8216;available,&#8217; but NASCAR had such negotiations regularly during the negotiation period,&#8221; Bell wrote in his order. &#8220;And, those individual negotiations achieved concrete results, including the final 2025 Charter agreement that was signed by 13 teams acting individually (and against the supposed &#8216;joint agreement&#8217;)&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n<cite>Judge Kenneth Bell<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\nJudge Bell will also have to rule on two other summary judgment motions: one filed by NASCAR and another by 23XI and FRM to designate the market as &#8220;premier stock-car racing.&#8221;\n\nDespite two days of mediation last week, the dispute was not resolved and the trial is scheduled for December 1 in North Carolina.\n\n23XI and FRM are the only two organizations out of 15 that refused to sign charter extensions, which are fundamental to NASCAR&#8217;s business model. A car with a charter is guaranteed income and access to weekly races, and without them both teams claim they would almost certainly go bankrupt.\n\n&#8220;Today&#8217;s decision has only reaffirmed my clients&#8217; unwavering pursuit of a fairer and more equitable sport,&#8221; said Jeffrey Kessler, attorney for 23XI\/FRM. &#8220;Their determination remains strong as we continue our efforts for a resolution that benefits everyone: teams, drivers, employees, partners, and fans.&#8221;\n\nNASCAR said in a statement that it is still hoping to reach an agreement. The season ends with Sunday&#8217;s championship final in Phoenix and Hamlin is one of the four drivers eligible for the Cup title.\n\n&#8220;We respect the Court&#8217;s decision, although we respectfully disagree with its legal reasoning,&#8221; NASCAR said. &#8220;Our priority remains to resolve this matter quickly so that all parties can focus on Championship weekend and continue to grow the sport.&#8221;\n\n&#8220;In the event that a resolution is not reached, we intend to appeal the decision at the appropriate time.&#8221;","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Federal Judge Dismisses NASCAR Counterclaim in Legal Dispute A federal judge ruled in favor of 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, dismissing the counterclaim filed by NASCAR in a legal dispute over allegations of anti-competitive practices. Judge Kenneth Bell issued a summary judgment in favor of the teams, rejecting NASCAR&#8217;s claim that Curtis Polk, co-owner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":81690,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[208,837,241,182],"class_list":{"0":"post-81689","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-nascar","8":"tag-antitrust","9":"tag-charters","10":"tag-lawsuit","11":"tag-nascar"},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81689"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81689\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/81690"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alofokedeportes.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}