Knicks and Raptors Settle Legal Dispute: Case Closed for Data Theft

3 Min Read

Knicks and Raptors Settle Legal Dispute

The New York Knicks and the Toronto Raptors have reached an agreement to voluntarily dismiss the 2023 lawsuit involving the alleged theft of thousands of confidential files. This is according to a court filing on Friday.

Both teams issued the same statement: “The Knicks and Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment (owners of the Raptors) withdrew their respective claims and the matter is resolved. The parties are focused on the future.”

The lawsuit was filed by the Knicks in August 2023, seeking more than $10 million in damages. The team alleged that the Raptors recruited Ikechukwu Azotam, who worked for New York from 2020 to 2023, and ordered him to provide a large amount of internal information after Toronto began recruiting him in the summer of 2023. The Knicks argued that this effort was aimed at giving the Raptors a competitive advantage.

The Knicks specifically accused Azotam, who served as an assistant video coordinator, and then as director of video/analytics/assistant player development, of sending the Raptors thousands of confidential files, including play frequency reports, a 2022-23 season preparation book, scouting video files, and opposition research.

The Knicks alleged that Azotam acted at the request of the Raptors, who, according to them, were trying to “organize, plan and structure the new coaching and video operations staff,” according to the August 2023 complaint.

The Raptors, Azotam, Toronto coach Darko Rajaković, player development coach Noah Lewis, and 10 “unknown” employees were named as defendants in the lawsuit.

In an October 2023 court filing, the Raptors called the Knicks’ accusations “baseless” and a “public relations stunt.” The Raptors argued that the “alleged ‘data theft’ involved little more than publicly available information compiled through public sources easily accessible to all NBA members.”

The Raptors repeatedly asked NBA commissioner Adam Silver to intervene and resolve the dispute, and a judge in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Lower Manhattan agreed.

The case was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, which means it is permanently dismissed.

Share This Article
Hola, estoy aquí para ayudarte con esta noticia!
Exit mobile version